FCA bans father and son from insurance broker
The Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) has decided to ban a father and son from the UK financial services industry after a High Court judgment found they engaged in fraud and misused client money at AFL Insurance Brokers. The regulator ruled that Alec Finch and Robert Finch failed to act with honesty and integrity while running the firm. According to the FCA, the pair used client funds to cover business expenses and concealed the shortfall when they attempted to sell the company.
Fraudulent sale attempts
When the Finches sought to sell AFL, they created false financial records to mislead the buyer and their own accountants. The regulator stated that the duo concealed the misuse of client money and overstated the firm’s financial position, leaving the business with a significant deficit. High Court proceedings began in August 2020 when the buyer initiated a claim for loss and damages. The judgment against the pair was handed down on September 27, 2023.
Therese Chambers, the FCA’s joint executive director of enforcement and market oversight, said the High Court found the father and son were the driving force behind the fraud. She noted that they painted a false picture of a successful business and used client money for personal benefit, which they knew was wrong. The regulator emphasized that it will not tolerate serious misconduct and will take action to remove wrongdoers from the sector.
Related: Paul Waters leads Hymans Robertson charity arm
Appeal process underway
The FCA announced the bans on July 23, 2026. Both Alec Finch and Robert Finch have referred the decision notices to the Upper Tribunal. Any findings in the notices are currently provisional, reflecting the FCA’s understanding of the events and its characterization of their behavior. This legal route allows them to present their case before a tribunal, which will review the evidence and the regulator’s conclusions.
While the tribunal process plays out, the pair remains barred from the industry. The case highlights the strict enforcement measures the FCA can apply when client money is misappropriated, regardless of an individual’s role or tenure within a firm. The legal battle over the specific details of the financial records and the extent of the deficit continues through the appeals process.
It is plausible that other brokerages with similar ownership structures might face increased scrutiny from regulators. If the tribunal ultimately upholds the FCA’s findings, it could set a precedent for how asset sales are verified during ownership transitions. This might lead to more rigorous due diligence requirements or mandatory audits before shares in a firm can change hands, ensuring that the financial health presented to potential buyers is verifiable and accurate.
